Most of my readers are probably firmly in the Microsoft Windows world when it comes to using a computer. What is Microsoft (MS) Windows (in any one of its many incarnations, whose most common and recent members are Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7)? It's the operating system (OS) of the computer - for most people computers aren't very usable without an operating system. The operating system sits on top of the hardware and provides the complete logic for everything you see when running a computer - it connects to and registers various hardware devices while booting, like graphics card, sound card, mouse and monitor, and provides functions like user management, a graphical user interface (GUI), process management, and much more. The operating system does not include things like web browsers, mail programs or office suite programs (yes, there are alternatives to MS Office, see OpenOffice).
There are many other operating systems, some with restricted niche usage (RISC OS), some belonging to museum shelves (Amiga OS), and others are often used in the worlds of servers and computer programming. In recent years the many flavors of Linux have played an important and ever-growing role in this group. As a programmer I have long preferred working with Linux, and my work PCs always had Linux (usually SuSE) as their primary operating system. In particular the command shells in Linux are powerful tools for the programmer, making it easy to perform a variety of programming tasks.
For those (like me) who like or need to work with more than one OS on a single computer, there are couple of possibilities. One possibility (which I had always used on my private PCs) is to install the second OS parallel to the first, and offer a choice at booting which OS should be started. The advantage of this method is that the technology is fairly old and well understood, and the OS being run has access to the full hardware resources of the computer. The disadvantages include the fact that switching OS requires a new boot, and that the necessary change to the MBR (Master Boot Record) of the computer can render certain functions inoperative - for example, while my laptop was configured to dual boot Windows 7 or SuSE 11.2 I couldn't use the suspend to disk function, nor could I perform a full system backup (which gave me the incentive to try the following alternative).
Another possibility is using a so-called Virtual Machine (VM). A virtual machine makes it possible to run another operating system "in a box" within another OS. The programs that make this possible are getting better all the time. There are commercial programs available such as VMWare and there are also free alternatives (at least for private users), such as VirtualBox.
I already knew that my new employer (starting January 3rd) uses CentOS Linux, a variety of Red Hat Linux. Since I have plenty of time this month before starting my new job, I decided to try out CentOS on my laptop, and to circumvent the problems I'd had with my dual boot system by using VirtualBox on a Windows host.
When using a virtualization program we talk about the host system and the guest system. The host system is the system which runs the virtualization program. The guest system is the OS running inside the virtualization program. The guest system then runs inside a window of the host OS, and you can switch between programs operating in both systems with a click.
Finally it's time for a picture. After installing VirtualBox (I have 3.2.12) and starting the programm, you'll see a screen similar to this (click on this image and the following images to see a larger version):
On the left side you see my virtual CentOS, which is running. To establish a new virtual OS you need an installation medium for that OS, such as a CD, DVD or downloaded ISO image. A virtual hard drive for the guest sytem is created on the host hard drive in the form of a .vdi file - this file is not normally readable by the host OS.
I got CentOS 5.5 up and running within a few hours, which I found quite acceptable considering I hadn't done this that way before. This includes wireless networking, which works in a completely transparent way - my wireless card, up and running under Windows, is seen as a normal (virtual) network interface in the guest OS which doesn't need any additional configuration, not even the wireless password.
It's now possible to run the guest system in seamless mode - that means that windows of programs running in the guest OS float like normal windows in the host OS. Here's an example:
Here you can see the open browser window (in Windows 7) where I'm writing this blog post. Overlaying that partially is a command shell window from CentOS. I can click back and forth between the two windows without any other switching overhead. You might notice at the bottom of the screen that the KDE task bar is visible above the Windows task bar - I can choose any running program from either OS.
The alternate to seamless mode has the complete guest OS running within a self-contained window:
Here CentOS is running in the window on the right side of the screen, and all programs running under the CentOS VM are contained within that window. This certainly helps avoid getting confused when switching between the operating systems!
So far I've noticed no unpleasant side effects. I allocated 40 GB of my ample hard drive to CentOS; at the moment I'm giving it only 512 MB of RAM from my 4 GB - if I notice problems when doing heavy compiling I might up that a bit. I made one of my Windows partitions visible to CentOS, so I can open documents and other files if needed from the guest system. Networking was absolutely easy.
In summary - I imagine this post might be a bit boring to some of my regular readers, but I was just so excited about this technical success story I had to share it with you. And maybe expand my readership in the process.
Saturday, December 04, 2010
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
The Kindle - First Impressions
Two Weeks of Kindling
I've now had my Kindle for nearly two weeks, and it's time to share some of my impressions with you.
After unpacking it I immediately charged it up and synched it with my Amazon account. Actually it was already synched - Amazon preconfigures them. I connected it pretty easily to my home WiFi network (I have a prodigiously long, difficult password). I downloaded some new books and some old books. In a short period of time my Kindle was playing host to:
The Kindle always remembers the farthest point I've read to in every book, and syncs this point with the mobile Kindle app on my Android phone and iPod touch (and back to the Kindle).

Another feature I didn't know about but really like - it comes with the New Oxford American Dictionary and the Oxford Dictionary of English installed, and if I move the cursor to the beginning of a word a small pop-up at the top or bottom of the page shows me the definition of the word.
Turning pages is pretty fast, depending on the text size - it seems to be faster if the font is larger (which is logical). With the font I normally use turning the page takes maybe a second at most. Page turning, which of course works in both directions, is done with the two buttons on either side of the device (you can see them in the photo above). One small quibble is that it's fairly easy to turn a page inadvertently, especially while carrying the device. You can always engage the screen lock, so that's not a major problem.
The Kindle 3 has an experimental Web browser, but frankly that's not very useful. Google Mail does load, but the rendering is slow. I'll stick to my Android phone and iPod touch for mobile browsing.
It's really wonderful reading on the Kindle in bed - I have an old volume of Shakespeare's collected works, but it's much too heavy to rest it on my chest. With the Kindle I can indulge myself in the Bard soooo easily!
In summary - I'm glad I indulged myself and bought it. I'll still be reading "normal" books for a long time to come, but I'll tend to buy new books purely electronically. Saves paper!
I've now had my Kindle for nearly two weeks, and it's time to share some of my impressions with you.
After unpacking it I immediately charged it up and synched it with my Amazon account. Actually it was already synched - Amazon preconfigures them. I connected it pretty easily to my home WiFi network (I have a prodigiously long, difficult password). I downloaded some new books and some old books. In a short period of time my Kindle was playing host to:
- Shakespeare's collected works
- Trollope's collected works
- Gulliver's Travels
- Pride and Prejudice
- Effective Java
- What Technology Wants
- ...and a few samples of other books.
The Kindle always remembers the farthest point I've read to in every book, and syncs this point with the mobile Kindle app on my Android phone and iPod touch (and back to the Kindle).

Another feature I didn't know about but really like - it comes with the New Oxford American Dictionary and the Oxford Dictionary of English installed, and if I move the cursor to the beginning of a word a small pop-up at the top or bottom of the page shows me the definition of the word.
Turning pages is pretty fast, depending on the text size - it seems to be faster if the font is larger (which is logical). With the font I normally use turning the page takes maybe a second at most. Page turning, which of course works in both directions, is done with the two buttons on either side of the device (you can see them in the photo above). One small quibble is that it's fairly easy to turn a page inadvertently, especially while carrying the device. You can always engage the screen lock, so that's not a major problem.
The Kindle 3 has an experimental Web browser, but frankly that's not very useful. Google Mail does load, but the rendering is slow. I'll stick to my Android phone and iPod touch for mobile browsing.
It's really wonderful reading on the Kindle in bed - I have an old volume of Shakespeare's collected works, but it's much too heavy to rest it on my chest. With the Kindle I can indulge myself in the Bard soooo easily!
In summary - I'm glad I indulged myself and bought it. I'll still be reading "normal" books for a long time to come, but I'll tend to buy new books purely electronically. Saves paper!
Thursday, October 07, 2010
To Kindle or not?
Yesterday I posted an innocent question on my Facebook Wall: "I'm starting to think seriously about getting a Kindle. Anyone want to convince me (or dissuade me)?" This post drew more feedback than any single status update I've ever made on FB. First off, to those who responded - thanks very much for the feedback, I really appreciate it!
The feedback could be grouped in three rough categories:
I can deal with group 2 (the iPad group) fairly easily. I'm not seriously considering getting an iPad right now for a variety of reasons:
Group 1 also includes those using other eBook devices, such as Sony's. I hadn't really seriously considered other devices since I'm such a devoted Amazon customer, but maybe I should.
I have a number of reasons for finally considering buying one of these things and leaving Group 3, where I was happily domiciled until now. First, let me say, I love paper (aka "real") books. I have many, many of them. There are always several stacked on my nightstand. I usually bring a couple with me on any vacation. Some of them have been my friends since my childhood. They are precious.
But the "many, many" aspect is a problem. I'm an apartment dweller, and will likely be one until my warranty expires. I hate throwing books away, even books I know I'll never read again. My dream has always been to have a room (a large room) with books on all four walls, ceiling to floor. This dream is not likely to be realized though. So I'm forced to prune my book collection at least once a year. It hurts.
The books I usually buy fall into a few general categories. A big category is "the classics". This is probably about a third of my current book population, and I never throw them away. Dickens, Hugo, Shakespeare, Austen, Trollope, Gaskell - these are books I read many times. I've already read Les Misérables three times (sorry to brag, just had to work that in, hélas!). Another big category is history. I never throw these away, either. I don't know if I think the Battle of Gettysburg might turn out differently the next time I read about it, or if Nixon might drop the Watergate cover up the next time. I could imagine reading these electronically, though. Another big category is contemporary politics and other current events books. I rarely read these things more than once, but since I read them when they're new, they're usually in the form of bulky, expensive hardcover books. I see a strong advantage in only buying them electronically.
I have some experience with reading books electronically already - I have the Kindle application on my Android phone and on my iPod. The Android app is quite handy - at the moment I'm reading Trollope's Barchester Towers on it. I always have my phone with me, so if I find myself in the subway for 10 minutes without anything to read I can join Septimus Harding and Dr. Grantly for a time. It drains the battery pretty fast though, and the screen is smallish.
Some of the interesting thoughts in this thread on my Facebook Wall (I hope no one minds that I quote them, but I won't use any names here):
My conclusion: none yet, I'm going to explore the alternatives available Germany. Being able to download books over 3G is not really a killer feature for me, since WiFi is generally available. There's little German content available now on any platform. I'm not going to buy an iPad in the near future. I'll let you all know if I buy one!
The feedback could be grouped in three rough categories:
- Buy one - they're great!
- Buy an iPad!
- Oh my god, another useless electronic toy - paper books are so nice!
I can deal with group 2 (the iPad group) fairly easily. I'm not seriously considering getting an iPad right now for a variety of reasons:
- It's too expensive
- I already have an iPod Touch, buying an iPad would remove a large part of its justification for existence (though I couldn't imagine using an iPad as a music player while jogging).
- It's too expensive
Group 1 also includes those using other eBook devices, such as Sony's. I hadn't really seriously considered other devices since I'm such a devoted Amazon customer, but maybe I should.
I have a number of reasons for finally considering buying one of these things and leaving Group 3, where I was happily domiciled until now. First, let me say, I love paper (aka "real") books. I have many, many of them. There are always several stacked on my nightstand. I usually bring a couple with me on any vacation. Some of them have been my friends since my childhood. They are precious.
But the "many, many" aspect is a problem. I'm an apartment dweller, and will likely be one until my warranty expires. I hate throwing books away, even books I know I'll never read again. My dream has always been to have a room (a large room) with books on all four walls, ceiling to floor. This dream is not likely to be realized though. So I'm forced to prune my book collection at least once a year. It hurts.
The books I usually buy fall into a few general categories. A big category is "the classics". This is probably about a third of my current book population, and I never throw them away. Dickens, Hugo, Shakespeare, Austen, Trollope, Gaskell - these are books I read many times. I've already read Les Misérables three times (sorry to brag, just had to work that in, hélas!). Another big category is history. I never throw these away, either. I don't know if I think the Battle of Gettysburg might turn out differently the next time I read about it, or if Nixon might drop the Watergate cover up the next time. I could imagine reading these electronically, though. Another big category is contemporary politics and other current events books. I rarely read these things more than once, but since I read them when they're new, they're usually in the form of bulky, expensive hardcover books. I see a strong advantage in only buying them electronically.
I have some experience with reading books electronically already - I have the Kindle application on my Android phone and on my iPod. The Android app is quite handy - at the moment I'm reading Trollope's Barchester Towers on it. I always have my phone with me, so if I find myself in the subway for 10 minutes without anything to read I can join Septimus Harding and Dr. Grantly for a time. It drains the battery pretty fast though, and the screen is smallish.
Some of the interesting thoughts in this thread on my Facebook Wall (I hope no one minds that I quote them, but I won't use any names here):
- "If you're on the beach and a wave washes across your paperback, you put it on a bench to dry and it's fine. If you misplace a paperback on a train in Central Eastern Europe it's not a big deal. If you want to carry on a running dialogue with your book, you underline, write in the margins and bend pages."
- "I think the concept is sound. But it might be better to go with whoever might ultimately have access to the best library. You'd want to be able to transfer content to future devices. Can a Kindle file be moved to an ipad or vice-versa?"
- "One of the things I am curious about is how the "digital rights management" stuff works with electronic books. For instance, if I buy a good old fashioned book, I can lend it to you. I know I can't copy it, but I can let someone else use it. Can you do that with an electronic book? By the way, I do not think I ever returned the copy of Jack Nicklaus's Golf my Way you lent me in 1976."
- "We've been having the same discussion in our house. I'm curious about what happens when you travel with a Kindle or iPad overseas - either stateside or in Europe. With the Kindle there may be extra charges on downloads if you're roaming, even using the wifi connection."
- "Some think e-books are crass. But there's reason to think they're more enlightened than heirloom leatherbounds. Better use of resources, especially space ... and unostentatious. Also more mentally-stimulating, if they increase the total amount of worthwhile reading."
- "We don't need a larger amount of worthwhile reading: we need more CAREFUL reading of ESSENTIAL stuff. Techne reigns. Read Heidegger. Read Nieztche on aphoristic reading. You're in Germany for gawd's sake. Just sayin'. (Think of Tommy Howells!)"
My conclusion: none yet, I'm going to explore the alternatives available Germany. Being able to download books over 3G is not really a killer feature for me, since WiFi is generally available. There's little German content available now on any platform. I'm not going to buy an iPad in the near future. I'll let you all know if I buy one!
Tuesday, October 05, 2010
The LKH - private insurance doesn't always work well
No, this post is not about fundamental issues of health insurance, merely an observation on a significant inefficiency at my private German insurer. I thought I had posted some info about the German health system in the past, but I see that isn't the case - definitely something I need to do. But not now. I just want to spout briefly on some annual madness at my German insurer, the LKH (Landeskrankenhilfe).
The LKH actually provides me with excellent health coverage (at a fairly hefty price). On the rare occasions I've had to talk with a representative there they've been friendly and helpful. But they have an amazing systemic flaw. They offer a good deal to policy holders - if you only submit (i.e. mail in, it doesn't work online) bills at most twice a year, they give you a 5% rebate on your tariff for the next calendar year. Given current interest rates that's a decent yield, as long as you can finance your doctor visits and prescription drugs yourself for a six month period. I always try to adhere to this.
Here's the rub - the insurance rates are always set on a January-based calendar year for all insurees, and the cut for the rebate is always September 1st for all insurees. Guess what that means? If you submit your receipts at the beginning of September (as I just did), it takes them at least six weeks to process them, since they're obviously overloaded.
Dear LKH, here's my question to you - why can't you make the September cut more flexible, perhaps making the cut on everybody's birthday? I know, there are some issues with timing in regard to the rates for the following year, but surely that could be worked out and your employees would have a much more even workload - and your service would be better for customers.
Why don't I switch to another insurer? Well, that's a tale for another post...
The LKH actually provides me with excellent health coverage (at a fairly hefty price). On the rare occasions I've had to talk with a representative there they've been friendly and helpful. But they have an amazing systemic flaw. They offer a good deal to policy holders - if you only submit (i.e. mail in, it doesn't work online) bills at most twice a year, they give you a 5% rebate on your tariff for the next calendar year. Given current interest rates that's a decent yield, as long as you can finance your doctor visits and prescription drugs yourself for a six month period. I always try to adhere to this.
Here's the rub - the insurance rates are always set on a January-based calendar year for all insurees, and the cut for the rebate is always September 1st for all insurees. Guess what that means? If you submit your receipts at the beginning of September (as I just did), it takes them at least six weeks to process them, since they're obviously overloaded.
Dear LKH, here's my question to you - why can't you make the September cut more flexible, perhaps making the cut on everybody's birthday? I know, there are some issues with timing in regard to the rates for the following year, but surely that could be worked out and your employees would have a much more even workload - and your service would be better for customers.
Why don't I switch to another insurer? Well, that's a tale for another post...
Monday, July 05, 2010
Subscribe to "Thoughts From Munich"
No incisive political or cultural analysis this time, no typical Webber humor - just take a look over at the left side of the page. There's a new gadget there; if you enter your email address you'll be notified any time I publish something new (a few of my trusty readers already get a mail, because I added your address to a list by hand). I promise you won't be spammed (at least not by me), unless you consider my writings to be spam - but in that case you're probably not reading this. Go ahead, add yourself to the list, share this with your friends (and enemies).
Saturday, July 03, 2010
The president of Germany
On June 30th Germany elected a new federal president (Bundespräsident in German). The 10th federal president of Germany is now Christian Wulff, 51, until now the prime minister of Lower Saxony, a German state. Christian Wulff is a member of the CDU (Christlich Demokratische Union). The media outside Germany have scarcely been aware of this event, yet it was accompanied by a great deal of drama in Germany. What happened? What's the role of the German president? Is there any wider significance?
What does the German Federal President do?
The German Federal President (I'll refer to the office as Bundespräsident from here out for simplicity) has a largely ceremonial office. Like the Queen of England, the Bundespräsident is the offical head of state. Like the Queen of England, most of his activities (there has not yet been a female Bundespräsident, who according to the rules of German grammar would be the Bundespräsidentin) are ceremonial - greeting foreign heads of state, giving speeches, awarding prizes. The Bundespräsident also signs bills into law; this normally happens automatically, but there have been a few cases in the history of the Bundesrepublik where a Bundespräsident refused to sign a bill, most recently in October 2006. The Bundespräsident normally has a term of five years, and may be reelected. In terms of prominence the office probably the most important next to the Bundeskanzler and the coach of the German national soccer team.
How is the Bundespräsident elected?
This is where it gets complicated and interesting, though not as complicated and interesting as the American Electoral College. It's as if the Germans wanted to emulate that system with its complexity, but chickened out before it got quite so bad. Still, the Bundespräsident is not elected via popular vote. Instead a special electoral college, the Bundesversammlung (Federal Convocation) is convened. This body consists of all members of the Bundestag (Federal Parliament) and an equals number of members selected by the state parliaments. This year the total number was 1244. The Bundesversammlung meets in the Reichstag in Berlin to do the actual electing. In the first two rounds an absolute majority is required to elect the president, in the third round a simple majority suffices.
Each party represented in the Bundestag can nominate its own candidate; typically parties in a coalition government agree on a single candidate. This year the Berlin ruling black/yellow coalition (CDU and FDP) agreed on Mr. Wulff as their joint candidate; in opposition the SPD and Green party agreed on a single candidate (more on that later); the opposition Left party (Die Linke) also put forth their own candidate. Oh yes, the right-extreme NPD (also known as Neo-Nazis), with three members out of the 1244, nominated a candidate. Usually the parties nominate a prominent figure connected to their party; on occasion they select someone outside the realm of politics.
So what happened this year?
The first unusual event was the resignation of Horst Köhler, the incumbent. Köhler had been re-elected to a second term as scheduled in May 2009. On May 31st of this year he unexpectedly announced that he was resigning, effective immediately. To this day no one knows exactly why he quit. He said it was a reaction to criticism of some remarks he made about the Bundeswehr (the Germany army) serving in Afghanistan; he said this criticism was inappropriate and showed a lack of respect for the office of the Bundespräsident. There has been much speculation about his real reasons; so far that has remained speculation.
To replace Köhler a special Bundesversammlung was called for June 30th. The ruling coalition of CDU/CSU and FDP quickly nominated Christian Wulff, a generally well-liked politician who at one time had been treated as a possible future chancellor, but whose star seemed to have reached its zenith. Everyone thought he was a good choice, as well as a skillful chess move by Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel - by making him president, she effectively removed him as a possible rival (no one, as far as I know, has ever gone on to an important elective office after being Bundespräsident). It looked like the coalition would have 644 votes, in theory giving a Wulff a clear majority in the first round of voting.
But the opposition SPD and Greens were clever. As their candidate they nominated Joachim Gauck, a former DDR pastor who became well known through his support of civil rights in the last months of the DDR, leading prayer meetings and protests. After reunification he was chosen to run the office which had the difficult job of securing, ordering and analyzing the voluminous files of the DDR secret police, the Stasi. This became known as the "Gauck Behörde", the Gauck Office. He ran this office in a pragmatic way for ten years, until 2000. Since then he has been a frequent guest in political talk shows and on the lecture circuit. Gauck is well-respected as one who risked his personal freedom to protest against the DDR, and who handled his difficult job with the Stasi files extremely well. His political views are probably closer to the ruling coalition than to the SPD/Greens, but he is a respected intellectual with strong personal integrity - an ideal candidate.
There was a great deal of muttering in the coalition about the unseemly quick choice of Wulff as candidate, without much discussion. Many in the coalition are extremely disappointed in the government, which was elected ten months ago with a sizable majority but has accomplished little since then. There was speculation some coalition members might defect and vote for Gauck.
Another delicate aspect of the election is the Left Party (Die Linke). This party is composed of mostly East German former members of the SED (the ruling party of the DDR), and disaffected Social Democrats from the West, led by former SPD Chairman Oskar Lafontaine. This grouping has been growing in strength in recent years, and has formed coalitions in state governments with the SPD and Greens, but so far a coalition at federal level has been taboo. As mentioned above, they were running their own candidate for Bundespräsident, the sociologist and TV journalist Luc Jochimsen (a woman). If the Left delegates would vote for Gauck, and if enough coalition delegates defected, he might be elected. Still, it seemed pretty unlikely - it would be unprecedented for so many to vote for the opposition candidate. Yet Gauck had broad support from the public; according to polls, shortly before the election it was running about 42% for Gauck and 36% for Wulff, with most of the rest undecided. Of course, that was largely irrelevant - but politicians are known to look at polls, aren't they?
The election
The election started at noon. The first round: 600 for Wulff, 499 for Gauck, 126 for Jochimsen, 3 for Rennicke (the NPD candidate), 13 abstaining. Wulff was 23 short of the absolute majority. This was an enormous shock. It was thought that he might lack a few votes from the coalition, but no one expected so many defections that he wouldn't be elected in the first round. In comparison - when Köhler was elected for the first time, he was elected in the first ballot with one vote more than an absolute majority; it's thought that about ten members of the CDU/CSU/FDP coalition defected that time. But here Wulff should have had 644 votes, so the defections were massive.
The second round was in the late afternoon: 615 Wulff, 490 Gauck, 123 Jochimsen, 3 Rennicke, 7 abstentions. Still short of an absolute majority. Still, this result would suffice in the third round - but what would the Left delegates do, and how much did the coalition delegates want to punish their government? The delegates withdrew to their caucuses, their leaders urged them to unity. The Left Party withdrew Jochimsen from the third round of voting, but refused to recommend their delegates vote for Gauck. He is not a well-loved figure in the Left Party - they have had a number of members whose past Stasi activity has been revealed by the Gauck office.
The final round was in the evening, the results were announced around 9:30 pm: Wulff 625, Gauck 494, 121 abstentions. Wulff was the tenth German Bundespräsident.
The aftermath
It had been speculated that Merkel's government would collapse if Wulff were not elected; that it took three rounds was not quite as bad for the government, but nonetheless a very bad result. So far nothing dramatic has happened, but the recriminations between and among the coalition partners have begun.
And it looks unlikely that the SPD will form a federal coalition with the Left Party soon.
What does the German Federal President do?
The German Federal President (I'll refer to the office as Bundespräsident from here out for simplicity) has a largely ceremonial office. Like the Queen of England, the Bundespräsident is the offical head of state. Like the Queen of England, most of his activities (there has not yet been a female Bundespräsident, who according to the rules of German grammar would be the Bundespräsidentin) are ceremonial - greeting foreign heads of state, giving speeches, awarding prizes. The Bundespräsident also signs bills into law; this normally happens automatically, but there have been a few cases in the history of the Bundesrepublik where a Bundespräsident refused to sign a bill, most recently in October 2006. The Bundespräsident normally has a term of five years, and may be reelected. In terms of prominence the office probably the most important next to the Bundeskanzler and the coach of the German national soccer team.
How is the Bundespräsident elected?
This is where it gets complicated and interesting, though not as complicated and interesting as the American Electoral College. It's as if the Germans wanted to emulate that system with its complexity, but chickened out before it got quite so bad. Still, the Bundespräsident is not elected via popular vote. Instead a special electoral college, the Bundesversammlung (Federal Convocation) is convened. This body consists of all members of the Bundestag (Federal Parliament) and an equals number of members selected by the state parliaments. This year the total number was 1244. The Bundesversammlung meets in the Reichstag in Berlin to do the actual electing. In the first two rounds an absolute majority is required to elect the president, in the third round a simple majority suffices.
Each party represented in the Bundestag can nominate its own candidate; typically parties in a coalition government agree on a single candidate. This year the Berlin ruling black/yellow coalition (CDU and FDP) agreed on Mr. Wulff as their joint candidate; in opposition the SPD and Green party agreed on a single candidate (more on that later); the opposition Left party (Die Linke) also put forth their own candidate. Oh yes, the right-extreme NPD (also known as Neo-Nazis), with three members out of the 1244, nominated a candidate. Usually the parties nominate a prominent figure connected to their party; on occasion they select someone outside the realm of politics.
So what happened this year?
The first unusual event was the resignation of Horst Köhler, the incumbent. Köhler had been re-elected to a second term as scheduled in May 2009. On May 31st of this year he unexpectedly announced that he was resigning, effective immediately. To this day no one knows exactly why he quit. He said it was a reaction to criticism of some remarks he made about the Bundeswehr (the Germany army) serving in Afghanistan; he said this criticism was inappropriate and showed a lack of respect for the office of the Bundespräsident. There has been much speculation about his real reasons; so far that has remained speculation.To replace Köhler a special Bundesversammlung was called for June 30th. The ruling coalition of CDU/CSU and FDP quickly nominated Christian Wulff, a generally well-liked politician who at one time had been treated as a possible future chancellor, but whose star seemed to have reached its zenith. Everyone thought he was a good choice, as well as a skillful chess move by Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel - by making him president, she effectively removed him as a possible rival (no one, as far as I know, has ever gone on to an important elective office after being Bundespräsident). It looked like the coalition would have 644 votes, in theory giving a Wulff a clear majority in the first round of voting.
But the opposition SPD and Greens were clever. As their candidate they nominated Joachim Gauck, a former DDR pastor who became well known through his support of civil rights in the last months of the DDR, leading prayer meetings and protests. After reunification he was chosen to run the office which had the difficult job of securing, ordering and analyzing the voluminous files of the DDR secret police, the Stasi. This became known as the "Gauck Behörde", the Gauck Office. He ran this office in a pragmatic way for ten years, until 2000. Since then he has been a frequent guest in political talk shows and on the lecture circuit. Gauck is well-respected as one who risked his personal freedom to protest against the DDR, and who handled his difficult job with the Stasi files extremely well. His political views are probably closer to the ruling coalition than to the SPD/Greens, but he is a respected intellectual with strong personal integrity - an ideal candidate.
There was a great deal of muttering in the coalition about the unseemly quick choice of Wulff as candidate, without much discussion. Many in the coalition are extremely disappointed in the government, which was elected ten months ago with a sizable majority but has accomplished little since then. There was speculation some coalition members might defect and vote for Gauck.
Another delicate aspect of the election is the Left Party (Die Linke). This party is composed of mostly East German former members of the SED (the ruling party of the DDR), and disaffected Social Democrats from the West, led by former SPD Chairman Oskar Lafontaine. This grouping has been growing in strength in recent years, and has formed coalitions in state governments with the SPD and Greens, but so far a coalition at federal level has been taboo. As mentioned above, they were running their own candidate for Bundespräsident, the sociologist and TV journalist Luc Jochimsen (a woman). If the Left delegates would vote for Gauck, and if enough coalition delegates defected, he might be elected. Still, it seemed pretty unlikely - it would be unprecedented for so many to vote for the opposition candidate. Yet Gauck had broad support from the public; according to polls, shortly before the election it was running about 42% for Gauck and 36% for Wulff, with most of the rest undecided. Of course, that was largely irrelevant - but politicians are known to look at polls, aren't they?
The election
The election started at noon. The first round: 600 for Wulff, 499 for Gauck, 126 for Jochimsen, 3 for Rennicke (the NPD candidate), 13 abstaining. Wulff was 23 short of the absolute majority. This was an enormous shock. It was thought that he might lack a few votes from the coalition, but no one expected so many defections that he wouldn't be elected in the first round. In comparison - when Köhler was elected for the first time, he was elected in the first ballot with one vote more than an absolute majority; it's thought that about ten members of the CDU/CSU/FDP coalition defected that time. But here Wulff should have had 644 votes, so the defections were massive.
The second round was in the late afternoon: 615 Wulff, 490 Gauck, 123 Jochimsen, 3 Rennicke, 7 abstentions. Still short of an absolute majority. Still, this result would suffice in the third round - but what would the Left delegates do, and how much did the coalition delegates want to punish their government? The delegates withdrew to their caucuses, their leaders urged them to unity. The Left Party withdrew Jochimsen from the third round of voting, but refused to recommend their delegates vote for Gauck. He is not a well-loved figure in the Left Party - they have had a number of members whose past Stasi activity has been revealed by the Gauck office.
The final round was in the evening, the results were announced around 9:30 pm: Wulff 625, Gauck 494, 121 abstentions. Wulff was the tenth German Bundespräsident.
The aftermath
It had been speculated that Merkel's government would collapse if Wulff were not elected; that it took three rounds was not quite as bad for the government, but nonetheless a very bad result. So far nothing dramatic has happened, but the recriminations between and among the coalition partners have begun.
And it looks unlikely that the SPD will form a federal coalition with the Left Party soon.
Thursday, June 03, 2010
Vienna
Introduction
Instead of a chronological account of our time in Vienna I'm going to organize this by themes, in the hope that it will be more interesting and more useful (should anyone happen to find this blog).
We landed at the Vienna airport Friday morning, and flew back out Monday evening, so we had nearly four full days to enjoy. I had only been here for a one-day business trip a year ago; Anja auditioned for some artists' agencies a number of years ago, but was only here for a day or two, and mostly concerned with singing, not with sightseeing. Our previous impressions were thus very limited.
Our hotel, the Hotel-Pension Shermin Apartments proved an excellent choice. The room was modern, clean and relatively spacious, and most important – extremely quiet. The personnel was friendly and helpful. It's located only a five-minute walk from the subway station Karlsplatz, and directly next to a tram stop.
Before our trip we ordered a Vienna Card for each of us online. This includes an unlimited 72-hour transit pass (which is not valid to/from the airport), and a number of coupons offering rebates on museums and shopping. My advice: if you're not a relentless museum junkie just by a transit pass separately. It's much cheaper, and many of the museums offer combination tickets with others that save just as much money. The public transit system is excellent – most of the subway lines operate in a five-minute rhythm throughout the day, there are many tram lines which also have a frequency between five and ten minutes.
We were fortunate with the weather – Friday was perfect, Saturday nearly so, there was just a brief downpour Sunday afternoon (but little sun thereafter). Monday was colder and showery.
The Viennese
There's a widespread prejudice that the Viennese are unfriendly and arrogant, most notably the waiters. We found this absolutely untrue. Everyone should spend an hour in the famous Cafe Landtmann near the Burgtheater.

These are the most famous waiters in Vienna. I suppose their manner could be misinterpreted as arrogant, but actually they put on a wonderful performance, with wry humor. When a lady put her damp umbrella on a wooden shelf, the waiter asked her with courtesy way to place it in an umbrella stand instead, showing her many potential resting places for her umbrella, but please, not the expensive woodwork!
Everywhere else we found only friendly, helpful people, whether in our hotel, in museums, in cafes, or in shops. Perhaps the tales about rude Viennese were started by German waiters to deflect from their own frequent lack of courtesy.
The Food
Vienna is a city with an international face. I've rarely seen a higher concentration of Japanese restaurants in Europe or North America. And of course there are plenty of Chinese, Greek, Hungarian, Italian and just about everything else restaurants. Oh yes- there are typically Viennese restaurants too.
A highlight for foodies is the Naschmarkt (literally Snack Market). This is Vienna's answer to Munich's Viktualienmarkt, or Seattle's Pike Place Market.
Stretching in two long, crowded rows along the Wienfluss, a small stream, it offers almost anything you could want to eat: cheese and salami from Italy, spices from the Middle East, produce from all over the world, meat and fish, falafel, hummus, marinated feta cheese. There are many small restaurants and cafes offering everything from Vietnamese food to traditional Viennese.
We had some of the best falafel I've ever tasted there. Our other dining experiences in Vienna included a wonderful Italian restaurant near our hotel (Ristorante da Gino e Maria) and several Viennese restaurants. We weren't overwhelmed by the latter – the cuisine is pretty similar to Bavarian. I highly recommend avoiding the big touristy restaurants in the inner city and looking for smaller places in the neighboring districts. One place we liked is called Ubl.
The Drink
The staple of Vienna is called a Melange – this is very close to cappuccino, but is apparently made with a milder coffee roast than cappuccino. We tended to punctuate our wanderings through the city every hour or two with a melange in a street cafe; we never found a bad melange (by contrast I've had tasteless cappuccino in Italy and elsewhere). Most places have it available in decaf as well. Of course regular coffee is available, and Viennese mocha is very good.
Wine is actually produced within the city limits of Vienna, and local wines are widely available. These tend to be fairly light white and red wines. The best place to try local wines is at one of the Heurigen, especially those in the wine-producing areas like Grinzing. See the separate section on Grinzing.
Beer is also prevalent, but there are not as many smaller breweries as in Germany. Confusingly, beer is served either in a Krügerl (a half liter) or a Seidl (a third of a liter).
Grinzing
We visited Grinzing Friday night with several goals: have dinner at a Heurigen, see the Beethoven museum in Heiligenstadt on the way, find Mahler's grave in the cemetery in Grinzing, and see the Mahler house in Grinzing.
There are at least two easy ways of getting to Grinzing from downtown – we chose to take the U4 subway to Heiligenstadt. Beethoven fans will know that Heiligenstadt is the former village he often spent his summers in; the place he wrote the famous “Heiligenstadt Testament” in the summer of 1802, when we was driven to despondency by his increasing deafness. The house he lives in is now a museum. From the description in our guide book this looked like a pleasant walk, followed by a short walk onward to Grinzing. When we left the subway station though we were dismayed by the surroundings; it was as if we had stepped out onto somewhere around N. 145th and Aurora Ave. in Seattle. We quickly decided not to try finding the Beethoven House on foot; instead we jumped on a bus headed to Grinzing.
I don't know I missed in the Beethoven museum, but taking the bus on to Grinzing was surely the right decision. The road to Grinzing was mostly through a modern suburb with little charm. Only when we approached the center of Grinzing (now within the Vienna city limits, but once a village) did the scenery improve. We got off the bus and tried to find the Grinzing cemetery – and Gustav Mahler. From the maps we had it looked as if it should be simple – but we walked in the heat for a good half hour, increasingly feeling our 4:30 AM rising that morning. We asked a gentleman passing by - “Just 100 meters straight ahead, then left.” We walked more than 100 meters and found no trace of a road or path to the left. Finally we gave up and decided to look for a place to have dinner, of course a Heuriger.
A Heuriger is a Viennese tradition, a rustic restaurant serving simple dishes and its own wine, often with live music. The name comes from “heurig”, referring to this year's wine. The Heurigen in Grinzing tend to be somewhat touristy, but Grinzing is perhaps the easiest “Heurigenort” to reach with public transit. As we approached one restaurant recommended to us, a bus load of tourists piled into the courtyard ahead of us. We decided to try something else. Nearby we found another place (there are many in Grinzing!) that was already pretty crowded, but we found a table outside. It was a delightful dining experience, mostly because of the atmosphere and the wine – the food and service were average at best. Obviously we didn't find Mahler's house either.
We took the tram (line 38) from Grinzing back to downtown, which was more pleasant than taking the bus back to Heiligenstadt. We were left to wonder what Heiligenstadt and the vicinity must have looked like 200 years ago when Beethoven was there.
Zentralfriedhof (Main Cemetery)
Vienna used to have many small cemeteries closer to town, but in the mid 19th century they were rapidly running out of room. Planning for the future, the city opened one central cemetery on the outskirts of town, hoping to cover all needs for the foreseeable future. The Zentralfriedhof is the second biggest by area in Europe (nearly 2.5 square km), and the largest by “population” , with close two 3 million registered burials. Most of the older cemeteries were closed to new burials. Originally heavily criticized as unattractive and too far from town, today the cemetery is reachable via tram and light rail, and has a wonderful mix of trees and open, meadow-like areas.
We took the light rail line to get there (the S7, the same line that goes to the airport); the station is on the far side away from the main entrance, yet close to an open gate. This area of the cemetery is the “Old Jewish Cemetery” - fascinating and profoundly sad. The grass grows long, in places head-high (I've been told that this is a Jewish tradition – does anyone know whether that is true?) Most of the graves here are from the epoch around World War I – there are many family graves, doctors, lawyers, teachers, shop owners, and many who were killed in action – dying for a country which killed most of their families 25 years later. I don't want to start a discussion here about the Nazi regime in Austria – I just found much to reflect on. Many of the headstones have been restored recently – since 1991 a society named Shalom has restored and repaired headstones and graves.

The Zentralfriedhof has a monumental church, and near the church several sections of Ehrengräber (Graves of Honor). Here can be found the graves of Beethoven and Schubert (moved from other, older cemeteries), Brahms, the complete Strauß family, Schönberg, other musicians, and many famous politicians (local and national), actors, writers and others. I was moved to find the grave of Leonie Rysanek, a famous opera singer with whom I once worked at Seattle Opera.

The only cemetery I've seen that compares with this is Père Lachaise in Paris – but there the famous graves are scattered everywhere, in Vienna they're compactly organized. I found it ironic that many Viennese local politicians are buried in such proximity to Beethoven, Nestroy and others – the former are probably mostly forgotten (quick – who was on the city council of Seattle in 1957?), the latter will never be forgotten.
Composers
Probably no city can claim so many composers of the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries. The list of graves above bears witness to this, and walking around town you see plaques everywhere proclaiming “Mozart lived here”, “Beethoven lived here”, or more likely, “Here stood a house where Mozart lived”. There are museums for Beethoven, Mozart, Schubert, Haydn, Strauss, Mahler, and probably other composers I'm not thinking of at the moment. For the first three there are at least two museums or memorials apiece. We visited the house Mozart lived in for the longest period in Vienna, during which he composed “The Marriage of Figaro” among other works. This was a charming museum, giving a good feeling for how he lived, with household items similar to things he might have owned. I found this much more interesting than the Mozart Birth House in Salzburg.
We also visited the Pasqualati House, where Beethoven lived at several different times (he moved very frequently). He composed his Fourth, Fifth and Seventh symphonies here, “Fidelio”, and other works. The museum is small (and you need to climb a narrow staircase to the 5th floor), but features a Broadwood piano similar to the one he owned, and a few miscellaneous objects he owned (a sugar box). Definitely worth a visit if you're a Beethoven fan, but not as impressive as the Beethoven House in Bonn.
The Inner City
If Johann Strauss went for a walk in the Innere Stadt, he’d probably recognize it, but Beethoven or Mozart would not. The inner city is a roughly circular area bounded by a ring of streets where in Mozart’s day the city walls stood. Most of the buildings seem to date from the late 18th to the late 20th century, with the exception of the many churches, most of which are even older. And of course the Habsburgs’ city palace, the Hofburg, which evolved over centuries.
The main shopping mile, which runs roughly in the form of a cross from near the State Opera (an impressive building!) with interruptions north to the Danube canal (not very blue), is larger than in any German city I’ve been in, and is completely interchangeable with any of them. You see the same stores here you see anywhere in Europe (or much of the world) – H&M, Douglas, Benetton, C&A and more. If you’re looking for “Old Vienna” it’s easy to be disappointed, but if you look hard, especially to the north and east of the Stefansdom, you can find some old narrow alleys. Confusingly, practically every street in Vienna is called “Gasse” (Alley), but most of them are streets in any sense of the word.
The inner city is dominated by St. Stephans (Stefansdom), a mighty cathedral. Unfortunately it tends to be overrun with tourists, making it difficult to wonder at the architecture inside and out in peace.

I was planning to write about Schönbrunn, the Prater and more, but this post has already reached epic proportions. So I'll break off here, and hopefully continue soon. Some pictures will be posted on my Facebook profile for my FB friends, and I'll post more to Flickr.
Instead of a chronological account of our time in Vienna I'm going to organize this by themes, in the hope that it will be more interesting and more useful (should anyone happen to find this blog).
We landed at the Vienna airport Friday morning, and flew back out Monday evening, so we had nearly four full days to enjoy. I had only been here for a one-day business trip a year ago; Anja auditioned for some artists' agencies a number of years ago, but was only here for a day or two, and mostly concerned with singing, not with sightseeing. Our previous impressions were thus very limited.
Our hotel, the Hotel-Pension Shermin Apartments proved an excellent choice. The room was modern, clean and relatively spacious, and most important – extremely quiet. The personnel was friendly and helpful. It's located only a five-minute walk from the subway station Karlsplatz, and directly next to a tram stop.
Before our trip we ordered a Vienna Card for each of us online. This includes an unlimited 72-hour transit pass (which is not valid to/from the airport), and a number of coupons offering rebates on museums and shopping. My advice: if you're not a relentless museum junkie just by a transit pass separately. It's much cheaper, and many of the museums offer combination tickets with others that save just as much money. The public transit system is excellent – most of the subway lines operate in a five-minute rhythm throughout the day, there are many tram lines which also have a frequency between five and ten minutes.
We were fortunate with the weather – Friday was perfect, Saturday nearly so, there was just a brief downpour Sunday afternoon (but little sun thereafter). Monday was colder and showery.
The Viennese
There's a widespread prejudice that the Viennese are unfriendly and arrogant, most notably the waiters. We found this absolutely untrue. Everyone should spend an hour in the famous Cafe Landtmann near the Burgtheater.
These are the most famous waiters in Vienna. I suppose their manner could be misinterpreted as arrogant, but actually they put on a wonderful performance, with wry humor. When a lady put her damp umbrella on a wooden shelf, the waiter asked her with courtesy way to place it in an umbrella stand instead, showing her many potential resting places for her umbrella, but please, not the expensive woodwork!
Everywhere else we found only friendly, helpful people, whether in our hotel, in museums, in cafes, or in shops. Perhaps the tales about rude Viennese were started by German waiters to deflect from their own frequent lack of courtesy.
The Food
Vienna is a city with an international face. I've rarely seen a higher concentration of Japanese restaurants in Europe or North America. And of course there are plenty of Chinese, Greek, Hungarian, Italian and just about everything else restaurants. Oh yes- there are typically Viennese restaurants too.
A highlight for foodies is the Naschmarkt (literally Snack Market). This is Vienna's answer to Munich's Viktualienmarkt, or Seattle's Pike Place Market.
Stretching in two long, crowded rows along the Wienfluss, a small stream, it offers almost anything you could want to eat: cheese and salami from Italy, spices from the Middle East, produce from all over the world, meat and fish, falafel, hummus, marinated feta cheese. There are many small restaurants and cafes offering everything from Vietnamese food to traditional Viennese.
We had some of the best falafel I've ever tasted there. Our other dining experiences in Vienna included a wonderful Italian restaurant near our hotel (Ristorante da Gino e Maria) and several Viennese restaurants. We weren't overwhelmed by the latter – the cuisine is pretty similar to Bavarian. I highly recommend avoiding the big touristy restaurants in the inner city and looking for smaller places in the neighboring districts. One place we liked is called Ubl.
The Drink
The staple of Vienna is called a Melange – this is very close to cappuccino, but is apparently made with a milder coffee roast than cappuccino. We tended to punctuate our wanderings through the city every hour or two with a melange in a street cafe; we never found a bad melange (by contrast I've had tasteless cappuccino in Italy and elsewhere). Most places have it available in decaf as well. Of course regular coffee is available, and Viennese mocha is very good.
Wine is actually produced within the city limits of Vienna, and local wines are widely available. These tend to be fairly light white and red wines. The best place to try local wines is at one of the Heurigen, especially those in the wine-producing areas like Grinzing. See the separate section on Grinzing.
Beer is also prevalent, but there are not as many smaller breweries as in Germany. Confusingly, beer is served either in a Krügerl (a half liter) or a Seidl (a third of a liter).
Grinzing
We visited Grinzing Friday night with several goals: have dinner at a Heurigen, see the Beethoven museum in Heiligenstadt on the way, find Mahler's grave in the cemetery in Grinzing, and see the Mahler house in Grinzing.
There are at least two easy ways of getting to Grinzing from downtown – we chose to take the U4 subway to Heiligenstadt. Beethoven fans will know that Heiligenstadt is the former village he often spent his summers in; the place he wrote the famous “Heiligenstadt Testament” in the summer of 1802, when we was driven to despondency by his increasing deafness. The house he lives in is now a museum. From the description in our guide book this looked like a pleasant walk, followed by a short walk onward to Grinzing. When we left the subway station though we were dismayed by the surroundings; it was as if we had stepped out onto somewhere around N. 145th and Aurora Ave. in Seattle. We quickly decided not to try finding the Beethoven House on foot; instead we jumped on a bus headed to Grinzing.
I don't know I missed in the Beethoven museum, but taking the bus on to Grinzing was surely the right decision. The road to Grinzing was mostly through a modern suburb with little charm. Only when we approached the center of Grinzing (now within the Vienna city limits, but once a village) did the scenery improve. We got off the bus and tried to find the Grinzing cemetery – and Gustav Mahler. From the maps we had it looked as if it should be simple – but we walked in the heat for a good half hour, increasingly feeling our 4:30 AM rising that morning. We asked a gentleman passing by - “Just 100 meters straight ahead, then left.” We walked more than 100 meters and found no trace of a road or path to the left. Finally we gave up and decided to look for a place to have dinner, of course a Heuriger.
A Heuriger is a Viennese tradition, a rustic restaurant serving simple dishes and its own wine, often with live music. The name comes from “heurig”, referring to this year's wine. The Heurigen in Grinzing tend to be somewhat touristy, but Grinzing is perhaps the easiest “Heurigenort” to reach with public transit. As we approached one restaurant recommended to us, a bus load of tourists piled into the courtyard ahead of us. We decided to try something else. Nearby we found another place (there are many in Grinzing!) that was already pretty crowded, but we found a table outside. It was a delightful dining experience, mostly because of the atmosphere and the wine – the food and service were average at best. Obviously we didn't find Mahler's house either.
We took the tram (line 38) from Grinzing back to downtown, which was more pleasant than taking the bus back to Heiligenstadt. We were left to wonder what Heiligenstadt and the vicinity must have looked like 200 years ago when Beethoven was there.
Zentralfriedhof (Main Cemetery)
Vienna used to have many small cemeteries closer to town, but in the mid 19th century they were rapidly running out of room. Planning for the future, the city opened one central cemetery on the outskirts of town, hoping to cover all needs for the foreseeable future. The Zentralfriedhof is the second biggest by area in Europe (nearly 2.5 square km), and the largest by “population” , with close two 3 million registered burials. Most of the older cemeteries were closed to new burials. Originally heavily criticized as unattractive and too far from town, today the cemetery is reachable via tram and light rail, and has a wonderful mix of trees and open, meadow-like areas.
We took the light rail line to get there (the S7, the same line that goes to the airport); the station is on the far side away from the main entrance, yet close to an open gate. This area of the cemetery is the “Old Jewish Cemetery” - fascinating and profoundly sad. The grass grows long, in places head-high (I've been told that this is a Jewish tradition – does anyone know whether that is true?) Most of the graves here are from the epoch around World War I – there are many family graves, doctors, lawyers, teachers, shop owners, and many who were killed in action – dying for a country which killed most of their families 25 years later. I don't want to start a discussion here about the Nazi regime in Austria – I just found much to reflect on. Many of the headstones have been restored recently – since 1991 a society named Shalom has restored and repaired headstones and graves.
The Zentralfriedhof has a monumental church, and near the church several sections of Ehrengräber (Graves of Honor). Here can be found the graves of Beethoven and Schubert (moved from other, older cemeteries), Brahms, the complete Strauß family, Schönberg, other musicians, and many famous politicians (local and national), actors, writers and others. I was moved to find the grave of Leonie Rysanek, a famous opera singer with whom I once worked at Seattle Opera.
The only cemetery I've seen that compares with this is Père Lachaise in Paris – but there the famous graves are scattered everywhere, in Vienna they're compactly organized. I found it ironic that many Viennese local politicians are buried in such proximity to Beethoven, Nestroy and others – the former are probably mostly forgotten (quick – who was on the city council of Seattle in 1957?), the latter will never be forgotten.
Composers
Probably no city can claim so many composers of the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries. The list of graves above bears witness to this, and walking around town you see plaques everywhere proclaiming “Mozart lived here”, “Beethoven lived here”, or more likely, “Here stood a house where Mozart lived”. There are museums for Beethoven, Mozart, Schubert, Haydn, Strauss, Mahler, and probably other composers I'm not thinking of at the moment. For the first three there are at least two museums or memorials apiece. We visited the house Mozart lived in for the longest period in Vienna, during which he composed “The Marriage of Figaro” among other works. This was a charming museum, giving a good feeling for how he lived, with household items similar to things he might have owned. I found this much more interesting than the Mozart Birth House in Salzburg.
We also visited the Pasqualati House, where Beethoven lived at several different times (he moved very frequently). He composed his Fourth, Fifth and Seventh symphonies here, “Fidelio”, and other works. The museum is small (and you need to climb a narrow staircase to the 5th floor), but features a Broadwood piano similar to the one he owned, and a few miscellaneous objects he owned (a sugar box). Definitely worth a visit if you're a Beethoven fan, but not as impressive as the Beethoven House in Bonn.
The Inner City
If Johann Strauss went for a walk in the Innere Stadt, he’d probably recognize it, but Beethoven or Mozart would not. The inner city is a roughly circular area bounded by a ring of streets where in Mozart’s day the city walls stood. Most of the buildings seem to date from the late 18th to the late 20th century, with the exception of the many churches, most of which are even older. And of course the Habsburgs’ city palace, the Hofburg, which evolved over centuries.
The main shopping mile, which runs roughly in the form of a cross from near the State Opera (an impressive building!) with interruptions north to the Danube canal (not very blue), is larger than in any German city I’ve been in, and is completely interchangeable with any of them. You see the same stores here you see anywhere in Europe (or much of the world) – H&M, Douglas, Benetton, C&A and more. If you’re looking for “Old Vienna” it’s easy to be disappointed, but if you look hard, especially to the north and east of the Stefansdom, you can find some old narrow alleys. Confusingly, practically every street in Vienna is called “Gasse” (Alley), but most of them are streets in any sense of the word.
The inner city is dominated by St. Stephans (Stefansdom), a mighty cathedral. Unfortunately it tends to be overrun with tourists, making it difficult to wonder at the architecture inside and out in peace.
I was planning to write about Schönbrunn, the Prater and more, but this post has already reached epic proportions. So I'll break off here, and hopefully continue soon. Some pictures will be posted on my Facebook profile for my FB friends, and I'll post more to Flickr.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






